One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is the colossal upsurge in the use of travelling to study. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in the country. In my opinion, travelling to study has more negative impacts than positives in the country.
One the one hand, critics may point out that one of the most significant benifits of travelling to study is the avaibility of extra time. For example, people, unlike in the past now are more advance with the emerging technology. On the other hand, there are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. One of the most preponderant one is that travelling to study has negative consequences for the country in various ways. Firstly, travelling to study is over-rated because machines are increasingly taking the role of humans, such as in education sectors. According to "Himalayan Times December 2020 edition", the proportion of Americans education in education sectors has dropped from 20 per cents to 8 per cents today. Secondly, a large portion of people has lost their enthusiasm and energy because of technological dependency and is incresingly being lazier and less efficient. Lastly, in my opinion, the government of Nepal is taking a great initiative in educating its citizens against the negative impacts of travelling to study. Citizens are being encouraged to spend significant portion of their time in theories and book knowladge. In my view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite having some benefits, the drawbacks of travelling to study in the country are indeed too dire to ignore.